Friday, September 22, 2017

Posts for September 22, 2017
These are the posts that are accumulated in our weekly newsletter which goes out throughout the school year. The posts are organized by the major units in our Constitutional Law (5th ed.) student textbook.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor Aims to Expand Scope of Civics Education Efforts [School Law Blog, 9/22/17]:  U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, speaking as the keynoter at a forum on civics education Thursday, stressed the importance of engaging young people of various backgrounds on the topic.

New opinion -- student-athletes showing concussion signs have a right to be protected [CA3 blog, 9/21/17]: The 3rd Circuit held that a student-athlete at a state school who is showing signs of a concussion has a constitutional right to be protected from further violent hits. 
The decision in  Mann v. Palmerton Area School Dist. can be found at:

Expanded rating system helps California parents understand how schools are doing [EdSource, 9/21/17]: California is the first state in the nation to get enhanced school ratings from GreatSchools, an Oakland-based nonprofit. The improved ratings now include course access, student progress and equity — which are intended to help parents choose schools, advocate to improve them and support their children’s education.

I. Introduction to Law, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

E&E News legal reporters preview Supreme Court's fall term [YouTube, 9/21/17]: E&E News legal reporters Amanda Reilly and Ellen M. Gilmer preview the Supreme Court's fall term and highlight key energy and environment lawsuits causing a nuisance for President Trump's agenda to rollback climate and other environmental regulations.

Lainey Feingold: Negotiating better access for the disabled [ABA Journal, 9/20/17]: Rather than litigation, Feingold finds solutions through structured negotiation, a collaborative dispute resolution method. Businesses like it because the process is cheaper and often faster than litigation, she says. Also—because the settlement agreements always include extensive product testing, input and feedback by people who are blind—it works better for her clients.

In Trump's America, is the Supreme Court still seen as legitimate? [“The Conversation” blog, 921/17]: Regardless of the Supreme Court’s [travel ban] decision, some Americans will agree and others will not. And whatever the decision, the court will expect the president to comply with its ruling. Political leaders usually follow court decisions they disagree with out of a sense of duty: They believe the Supreme Court’s decisions deserve respect because obedience to the law is an essential feature of democracy. Political scientists call this belief “legitimacy.”

Justice Sotomayor says cameras intrude on the Supreme Court's process [Wash Times / CNN, 9/21/17]: Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said Thursday she doesn’t support having cameras inside the Supreme Court, saying she fears they would distort the justices’ behavior and hurt the court’s role in government.

II. Defining the Political System: Federalism and Checks and Balances [See TOPICS 11-15 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

The American Presidency [TOPIC 15]

Trump aides begin looking for the exits [Politico, 9/22/17]: After a wave of high-profile White House departures this summer, staffers who remained are reaching out to headhunters to discuss their next moves.

Trump publicly backs healthcare effort, privately harbors doubts [Politico, 9/22/17]: In public, President Trump is all-in on the Senate’s final chance to repeal Obamacare. But privately, there’s ambivalence in the White House about the bill’s contents and its chances of clearing the tightly divided chamber next week.

Rep. Hunter calls for preemptive strike against North Korea [SD Union-Trib, 9/21/17]: Rep. Duncan Hunter said that the United States needs to launch a preemptive strike against North Korea in order to prevent the rogue nation from harming the U.S. first. 

Travel ban revisions may add countries, alter court challenge [USA Today, 9/22/17]:  The long and winding road to the Supreme Court for President Trump's travel ban may require yet another detour as the White House prepares to revise or replace it. The administration is planning to add additional countries to a list of nations whose citizens’ travel to the United States would be banned or restricted, an official familiar with the matter said Friday.

Can California Force Presidential Candidates to Release Tax Returns? [KQED, 9/22/17]: The so-called Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act seems destined for a legal challenge, if signed by the governor. “If he does sign it, I’m pretty sure the complaint is ready to be filed about 45 seconds after he finishes signing,” said Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School.

Defamation lawsuit against Trump gets boost from law professors [FAC, 9/21/17]: Three law professors filed an amicus brief arguing that a sitting president, in this case, Donald Trump, does not enjoy immunity from civil suits. The amicus brief concerned a lawsuit against Trump by a woman who appeared on The Apprentice and later alleged that Trump had kissed and attacked her.

III. The Political System: Voting and Campaigns [See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

Pelosi, Feinstein facing challengers amid protests from their left [SF Chron, 9/21/17]: It’s not a good time to be Nancy Pelosi or Dianne Feinstein. After a combined six-plus decades in Washington, they have become “the Man,” at least to a growing number of progressives who see them as embodiments of a Democratic Party taken over by “corporatists.” 

Legislation and the Legislative Process (TOPIC 20)

Kimmel tells viewers: ‘We have until Sept. 30’ to stop GOP health bill [Politico, 9/21/17]: Jimmy Kimmel on Thursday said it’s not his job to talk about health care — but he’s doing it anyway, until Senate Republicans’ last-ditch bill to repeal Obamacare is stopped. “I should not be the guy you go to for information on health care,” the late-night TV host said on Thursday’s show. “And if these guys … would tell the truth for a change, I wouldn’t have to.”

Vote Trading Or Compromise? How Water Bill Was Resurrected In Legislature's Final Hours [CPR, 9/21/17]: It was 11:59pm last Friday, and Assembly Bill 313 sat silently in the Senate Appropriations Committee, where it had slumbered untouched for weeks. Less than three hours later, it had passed both chambers of the Legislature and was heading to the governor’s desk. 

IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit

Jeff’s Law [ABA Journal, Oct. 2017]: The attorney general sees his role as pushing present-day law enforcement toward a rose-colored past.

Fourth Amendment Blockbuster Tops Supreme Court Criminal Docket [Bloomberg, 9/21/17]: A relatively calm U.S. Supreme Court term will soon give way to what court watchers say could be a stormy one when the justices take the bench Oct. 2. Among the pivotal criminal law issues in the 2017 term are the balance between surveillance and privacy in the mobile phone era, the treatment of immigrants who break the nation’s laws, and whether death row inmates can challenge legal errors they claim are grave enough to save them.

Mass. High Court Says Field Sobriety Tests Don’t Work for Marijuana [CNS, 9/22/17]: Massachusetts’ highest court ruled this week that field sobriety tests are not good enough to determine whether a driver is too high on marijuana to be behind the wheel.

V. 1st Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and Assembly) [See TOPICS 29-33 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

Surveys show disturbing results for young people and First Amendment [FAC, 9/21/17]: A Brooking Institution survey revealed that one in five undergraduate college students approved of using violence to stop controversial speakers while a majority approved of disrupting speakers by shouting them down.

Cal in tough spot over Free Speech Week [SF Chron, 9/21/17]: A four-day event featuring far-right speakers planned for UC Berkeley next week is creating an environment unlike “any university has ever faced,” and the campus is mobilizing hundreds of police officers to head off potential trouble, Chancellor Carol Christ told The Chronicle on Thursday.

ACLU Challenges Michigan’s Religious-Freedom Adoption Rule [CNS, 9/21/17]: The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of lesbians who were denied the opportunity to adopt children through Michigan’s foster care system, challenging the state’s practice of letting taxpayer-funded agencies reject qualified same-sex couples because of religious objections.

VI. 14th Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working, Citizenship & Immigration [See TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

How First Amendment Speech Doctrine Ought to Be Created and Applied in the Colorado Baker/Gay Wedding Dispute at the Supreme Court [Justia, 9/22/17]: Professors Amar and Brownstein point out that the US Supreme Court has no comprehensive doctrine on compelled speech under the 1st Amendment, especially as compared to its very nuanced doctrine on suppression of speech. Amar and Brownstein identify core elements that should comprise a comprehensive doctrine and call upon the Supreme Court to adopt similar guidelines when it decides an upcoming case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which a baker challenges a Colorado public accommodations law on 1st Amendment grounds, citing compelled speech. Without taking a position on how this dispute should be resolved as a matter of social policy, Amar and Brownstein argue that the doctrinal framework they describe does not support rigorous review in this case.

Obergefell Is Already Under Attack [Slate, 9/22/17]: Trump is laying the groundwork to overturn marriage equality.

The Supreme Court Gets Its First Test of Gay Rights Since 2015 [Bloomberg, 9/21/17]: A case that began with a chat about a wedding cake has grown into a clash between free speech and equality.

Trump's impact felt in Supreme Court labor rights cases [USA Today, 9/21/17]: When the Supreme Court opens its 2017 term on the first Monday in October, its very first cases will serve as a stark reminder of why elections matter. When the court was asked to hear three cases on labor arbitration agreements last September, Barack Obama was president, Hillary Clinton was heavily favored to succeed him, and federal appeals court Judge Merrick Garland was in line to replace the late Antonin Scalia. Garland had a strong record of defending worker’s rights. Also, below, see the video.

No comments:

Post a Comment