Posts for August 4, 2015
These are the posts that are accumulated in our
newsletter which goes out every 4-6 days during the school year. The posts are
organized by the major units in our Con Law (5th ed.) student textbook.
I.
Introduction to Law, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
Rights and legislation: Can Congress
over-ride a Supreme Court decision? [Democracy in America in “The Economist” blog, 7/28/15]: Following Obergefell v Hodges, the Supreme
Court’s recent landmark ruling in support of gay marriage, Mr Santorum
asserted, in a speech to the National Right to Life Foundation, that the
court does “not have the final say on anything. The American people have the
final say on everything.” It was this rather creative view of America’s
division of powers that Ms Maddow was keen to challenge. Here we consider their
debate, and pick apart their respective arguments.
II.
Defining the Political System: Federalism and Checks and Balances [See TOPICS 11-15 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law] Here are recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
III. The Political System: Voting and
Campaigns [See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
How to Save the Voting Rights Act [Slate, 8/4/15]: We need to stop
trying to untangle racism and partisanship by agreeing on one simple idea.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/08/how_to_save_the_voting_rights_act_voting_rights_shouldn_t_rely_on_parsing.html
IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th,
5th, 6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit
How the
Supreme Court Made It Legal for Cops to Pull You Over for Just About Anything
[The Marshall Project, 7/3/15]: Even hanging an air freshener.
https://www.themarshallproject.org/2015/08/03/how-the-supreme-court-made-it-legal-for-cops-to-pull-you-over-for-just-about-anything
Constitution
Check: Does cellphone privacy follow its owner's wanderings? [Constitution
Daily / Ars Technica, 8/3/15]: Lyle Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s
constitutional literacy adviser, examines a case that has just arrived at the
Supreme Court about police access to cellphone location data stored on
cellphone towers.
http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2015/08/constitution-check-does-cellphone-privacy-follow-its-owners-wanderings/
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/07/warrantless-mobile-phone-location-tracking-heads-to-supreme-court/
V. 1st
Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and Assembly) [See TOPICS 29-33 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law] Here are
some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
The Hell You Say [The New Yorker, 8/10/15]: The new
battles over free speech are fierce, but who is censoring whom?
Ex-Free Press reporter wins fight to keep source secret [Detroit Free Press, 7/31/15]: In what could be the end of an 11-year legal fight,
a federal appeals court sided with a former Detroit Free Press
reporter today, ruling he can claim Fifth Amendment protection
in keeping the name of an anonymous source secret.
VI. 14th
Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working, Citizenship & Immigration [See TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law]
Here are some recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
Group Created By Silicon Valley Millionaire Targets
Teacher Evaluations In California
[EdSource / Huff Post, 7/21/15]: Students
Matter, which is
challenging tenure and other teacher protection laws in Vergara v. California,
filed a second school lawsuit Thursday. It is suing 13 school districts that it
claims are violating the state law requiring student scores on state
standardized tests be a component of a teacher’s evaluation.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/21/students-matter-teacher-evaluations_n_7841812.html
Can This Lawsuit Fix Our Schools? [Cal Lawyer cover story, 8/1/15]: State and union
attorneys defend California teacher tenure rules against charges they foster
unequal education.
No comments:
Post a Comment