Posts for January 10, 2017
These are the posts
that are accumulated in our weekly newsletter which goes out throughout the
school year. The posts are organized by the major units in our Constitutional Law (5th ed.) student textbook.
I. Introduction to Law, the
Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law]
Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
The Supreme Court Will Lean Conservative Again [BuzzFeed, 1/9/17]: The Supreme Court is waiting --
but not for much longer; After a year of changes in outlook, the justices now
are waiting for Donald Trump to become president and name his nominee for the
court.
II. Defining the Political
System: Federalism and Checks and Balances [See TOPICS 11-15
in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
HHS Secretary warns of damage from potential ACA repeal
[Jurist, 1/10/17]: Health and Human Services
Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell warned on Monday that a move to repeal the Affordable
Care Act without simultaneously implementing a replacement plan would create a
dangerous situation in American healthcare.
http://www.jurist.org/paperchase/2017/01/hhs-secretary-warns-of-damage-from-potential-aca-repeal.php
The
American Presidency [TOPIC 15]
View today's Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation
hearing for Attorney General nominee Jeff Sessions: Via C-SPAN:
Jeff Sessions Has a History of Blocking Black
Judges [Mother Jones,
1/9/17]: "The senator has a problem putting
African Americans on the federal bench in Alabama."
Trump unfiltered: Tweets reveal his interests,
insecurities [AP, 1/9/17]: Many
presidents have privately bristled at the attacks, criticism and mockery the
office can bring. They've fumed behind the walls of the Oval Office and
complained about slights to their aides and wives. But Trump's use of Twitter
is giving Americans and the world something they've never seen before.
III. The Political System: Voting and Campaigns
[See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
Conservatives plan $10
million high court ad campaign [Politico, 1/9/17]: Conservative groups are planning to spend millions on an unprecedented
campaign to pressure Senate Democrats to confirm Donald Trump’s Supreme Court
nominee, according to sources familiar with the effort.
Legislation and the Legislative
Process (TOPIC 20)
Breakaway Senate Republicans Push to Delay Obamacare
Repeal [Bloomberg, 1/9/17]: A
breakaway group of five moderate Senate Republicans pushed Monday to delay a
bill repealing Obamacare until March -- potentially enough pressure to force
the party’s leadership to comply.
Freedom
Caucus ready to object to rushed Obamacare repeal without replacement plan [McClatchy, 1/9/17]:
With no certainty Monday night that Senate Republicans have enough votes to
pass a budget resolution that includes a repeal of the Affordable Care Act, the
most conservative members of the House met in the basement of a Capitol Hill
Tex-Mex restaurant to discuss their own Obamacare strategy.
GOP pushing 3 bills
in Congress to restrain federal regulations [SF
Chron, 1/9/17]: Freed from the constraint of a presidential veto, Republicans
are moving rapidly on industry-backed legislation that could paralyze the
government’s ability to protect the environment, public health and virtually
everything else federal agencies regulate.
GOP
turns to arcane budget process to repeal Obamacare [AP / The Independent, 1/9/17]: Yes, Donald Trump is
taking charge and Republicans control both the House and Senate, having won an
election promising to repeal President Barack Obama's health care law. But in Congress, getting from Point A to point B
rarely consists of a straight line, and Democrats in the Senate can easily gum
up the works with procedural blockades. Since Republicans hold the Senate with
just 52 votes, they are forced to employ an arcane, fast-track budget process
to avoid a Democratic filibuster.
IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th, 5th,
6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in
the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some
recent articles that are relevant to this unit
Is it time to hold police
officers accountable for constitutional violations? [Volokh
Conspiracy, 1/10/17]: Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a summary opinion in
the White v.
Pauly case. A police officer was sued for killing a man
during an armed standoff during which the officers allegedly never identified
themselves as police. The Supreme Court, however, concluded that the officer
had “qualified immunity.” That is, he was immune from a suit for damages,
because his conduct — while possibly unconstitutional — was not obviously unconstitutional.
Is Qualified
Immunity Unlawful? [SSRN, 1’9/17]:
Supreme Court Has Had Enough With Police Suits [Bloomberg, 1/9/17]:
V. 1st Amendment
(Speech, Religion, Press and Assembly)
[See TOPICS 29-33 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that
are relevant to this unit:
How a Blog Post Led to a Supreme Court Argument [NLJ / Rolling Stone, 1/4/17]: In 2011, Ronald Coleman banged out
a frustrated entry on his popular trademark blog about an Asian-American rock
band, The Slants, that was fighting to have its name accepted as a registered
trademark. “Good luck with that, fellows,” Coleman wrote on the blog, titled Likelihood of Confusion. He had written before about
the inconsistent policy of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office when it came to
trademark protection for offensive or disparaging names, and he did not hold
out much hope that The Slants could win.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/asian-american-group-the-slants-head-to-supreme-court-w460214
US Supreme Court loaded with First Amendment cases [Ars Technica, 1/10/17]: Can you trademark an
offensive name or not? Justices to decide.
VI. 14th
Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working, Citizenship & Immigration [See TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
International Law, Citizenship
and Immigration [TOPIC 40-42]
U.S. Supreme Court hears
arguments in local tribal sovereignty case [New London (Conn.) The Day / CNS, 1/9/17]: A Waterford attorney whose tribal sovereignty case the
U.S. Supreme Court heard Monday said he was encouraged by the questions the
justices posed during oral arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment