Posts for October 12, 2016
These are the posts
that are accumulated in our newsletter which goes out every 4-6 days during the
school year. The posts are organized by the major units in our Con Law (5th
ed.) student textbook.
I. Introduction to Law, the
Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law]
Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
What if nature, like
corporations, had the rights and protections of a person? [The
Conversation, 10/10/16]: In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court has solidified
the concept of corporate personhood. Following
rulings in such cases as Hobby Lobby and Citizens
United, U.S. law has established that companies are, like people,
entitled to certain rights and protections. But that’s not the only instance of
extending legal rights to nonhuman entities.
Supreme Court divided in
juror race-bias dispute [Reuters, 10/11/16]: The Supreme Court on Tuesday wrestled with a
fresh dispute involving race and the U.S. criminal justice system in a case
over whether a Hispanic man's sexual harassment convictions should be thrown
out because of a juror's racially charged statements during deliberations.
Social Conservatives'
Legal Juggernaut [Bloomberg, 10/11/16]: Alan Sears
has been on the front lines for some of the most polarizing legal issues of our
time, including same-sex marriage and bathroom access for transgender
individuals.
II. Defining the Political
System: Federalism and Checks and Balances [See TOPICS 11-15
in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
The
American Presidency [TOPIC 15]
U.S. court rules CFPB
structure unconstitutional; bureau can still operate [Reuters / Huff
Post, 10/11/16]: A federal appeals court on Tuesday declared the U.S. Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau's structure unconstitutional because too much power
is vested with its sole director, but said it can continue operating under the
president's supervision.
Obama Considers ‘Proportional’ Response to Russian
Hacking in U.S. Election [NY Times, 10/11/16]: Whatever the president
opts to do would probably not be announced in advance and may never be
acknowledged or disclosed if it is carried out, Mr. Earnest said.
III. The Political System: Voting and Campaigns
[See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
Unshackled Trump declares war on GOP [Politico,
10/11/16]: Backed by some of his fiercest allies and with little left to lose
politically, Donald Trump on Tuesday stepped up his attacks on House Speaker
Paul Ryan and the GOP establishment that has suddenly and decisively turned its
back on him.
‘I’m the Last Thing Standing Between You and the
Apocalypse’ [NY Times Mag, 10/11/16]: Inside the final weeks of
Hillary Clinton’s cautious — and surprisingly risky — campaign.
IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th, 5th,
6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in
the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some
recent articles that are relevant to this unit
DOJ to charge Arizona sheriff Arpaio with contempt [Jurist, 10/12/16]: The US Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on Tuesday that
it will file charges for misdemeanor contempt-of-court against Arizona Sheriff
Joseph Arpaio. Arpaio is being charged for violating a court order that required him
to end his immigration patrols.
Allocating Burdens of
Proof in a Criminal Case: An Arizona Decision Raises Questions [Justia, 10/12/16]: Professor Colb
comments on a recent decision by the Arizona Supreme Court holding that a state
statute properly created an affirmative defense to sexual abuse or child
molestation when it placed the burden of proving no sexual motive on the
defendant. Colb describes the court’s reasoning and explains why the U.S.
Supreme Court should revisit its jurisprudence affirmative defenses to crimes
and hold that some conduct may simply not be classified as an affirmative
defense to be proved by the defendant in a criminal case.
High Court to Dive
Into Case of Post-9/11 Arrests [CNS,
10/11/16[: The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to wade into a 14-year-old class
action brought by undocumented Muslims and Arabs who were rounded up on the
thinnest of pretexts and abused in jail in the months following the 9/11 terror
attacks.
V. 1st Amendment
(Speech, Religion, Press and Assembly)
[See TOPICS 29-33 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that
are relevant to this unit:
Dad Barred From
Talking Religion With Kids [CNS, 10/12/16]: A
Florida father must be restricted from expressing his religious beliefs to his
children because his views are emotionally damaging to them, a Florida appeals
court ruled
VI. 14th
Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working, Citizenship & Immigration [See TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
No comments:
Post a Comment