Posts for March 1,
2016
These are the posts
that are accumulated in our newsletter which goes out every 4-6 days during the
school year. The posts are organized by the major units in our Con Law (5th ed.) student textbook.
I. Introduction to Law,
the Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the
5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some
recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
When Should A Judge Recuse
Himself? Supreme Court Weighs The Question [NPR / SCOTUS blog, 2/29/16]:
The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday testing
whether a Pennsylvania Supreme Court justice violated the Constitution when he
ruled in a death penalty case that he had been involved with as a prosecutor.
Justice Thomas breaks
10-year silence in court [USA Today / The Atlantic, 2/29/16]: Thomas piped up for the first time since Feb. 22,
2006 — other than a brief quip uttered three years ago — with an extensive
series of questions about Second Amendment gun rights.
II. Defining the Political
System: Federalism and Checks and Balances
[See TOPICS 11-15 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law] Here are recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
Will the U.S. Supreme Court Take Precedent Seriously
on Abortion? [The Atlantic / Reuters,
2/29/16]: Justices are set to hear a major case this week -- and will be forced
to decide whether they meant what they've said in the past.
The American Presidency [TOPIC 15]
After meeting, Obama and
GOP remain at impasse over Supreme Court vacancy [USA Today,
3/1/16]: President Obama met with
top Senate leaders Tuesday at the White House in an attempt to bridge
the stand-off over whether the Obama should send a Supreme Court
nomination to the Senate.
Constitution Check: Could
the military disobey orders issued by a President Trump? [Constitution Daily,
2/29/16]: Lyle Denniston, the National
Constitution Center’s constitutional literacy adviser, looks at comments
from retired Air Force General Michael Hayden about possible conflict
between the military and a civilian President over controversial
orders – a debate triggered by recent comments from GOP candidate Donald
Trump.
III. The Political System: Voting and Campaigns
[See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
Legislation and the Legislative Process (TOPIC 20)
Coequal Branches of
Government
[SCOTUS blog, 2/29/16]: This essayis from U.S. Senator
Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the Chairman, Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th,
5th, 6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit
Supremes Study Oxford
Comma to Uphold Kiddie-Porn Sentence [CNS,
3/1/16]: A prior conviction for sexually abusing an adult justifies a long
prison sentence for a first-time child-pornography offender, the Supreme Court
ruled Monday.
Read the opinion in Lockhart v. U.S. at:
V. 1st
Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and Assembly)
[See TOPICS 29-33 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that
are relevant to this unit:
Taylor Bell's Rap
Song Comes to an End; Supreme Court
Denies Cert [EdLawProfs blog,
3/1/16]: Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Taylor Bell's
case. The case involved a high school student who had written and
performed a song on YouTube. The song was an attempt to raise awareness
regarding allegations that some of the male coaches at his school had been
sexually harassing female students, but which the school officials has
purportedly ignored.
VI. 14th
Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working, Citizenship & Immigration [See TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles
that are relevant to this unit:
Protection Against
Sexual Harassment Is Alive and Well in the 6th Circuit [Justia, 3/1/16]: Professor Grossman comments on a
recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in which
the court affirmed a jury verdict in favor of a sexual harassment plaintiff.
Grossman describes the facts leading up to the case and explains why the jury
and the appellate court came to the correct conclusion as a matter of fact and
law.
No comments:
Post a Comment