Posts for February
15, 2016
These are the posts
that are accumulated in our newsletter which goes out every 4-6 days during the
school year. The posts are organized by the major units in our Con Law (5th ed.) student textbook.
I. Introduction to Law, the
Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that
are relevant to this unit:
This is a job for Chief
Justice Roberts, judicial statesman [Maryland Appellate Blog, 2/15/16]: We now face efforts to transform the presidential
election into a nationwide judicial election. Democratic and Republican Super
PACs will weigh pour money into swing states, asking voters to elect a
president and Senators who will choose the “right” justice.
Scalia will be impossible
to replace [CNN,
2/15/16]: If you don't follow the
Supreme Court closely -- if you're a normal person -- your impression of
Justice Antonin Scalia is that he's a conservative who was on the court for a
really long time. Fair enough, but the legacy of the first Italian-American justice
is so much more than that.
Antonin Scalia: A
Consequential but Not a Great Justice [Jost on Justice, 2/14/16]: Despite the effusive praise from the legal right and
the respectful tributes from the left, Scalia is unlikely to be judged among
the greatest justices of all time. Yes, he leaves important legacies: the “original
meaning” method of constitutional interpretation and the “plain text” method of
statuary construction. But Scalia never mastered what Justice William J.
Brennan Jr. cited as the Supreme Court’s most famous rule: counting to
five.
And see his post, “'Lame
Duck' Nominees Often Confirmed to High Court” [2/14/16]:
What Happens to Justice
Scalia's Clerks? [WSJ’s Law Blog, 2/14/16]: As the
legal and political worlds process the sudden death of U.S. Supreme Court
Justice Antonin Scalia, questions remain for a small group of lawyers close to
the justice—his current and future law clerks.
Campaign Spending, Death Penalty in Play With High Court
Opening [Bloomberg News, 2/15/16]: And the
President faces a war over the court pick.
II. Defining the Political
System: Federalism and Checks and Balances
[See TOPICS 11-15 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law] Here are recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
The American Presidency [TOPIC 15]
Could Obama Bypass the
Senate with a Supreme Court Recess Appointment? [Nat. Rev., 2/14/16]:It ’s
a Supreme Court plotline that would be worthy of the upcoming season of House
of Cards, the Netflix show that often pits a power-driven president against an
obstinate Congress.
III. The Political System: Voting and Campaigns
[See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
When Judicial and
Presidential Politics Collide
[Justia, 2/15/16]: Professor Margulies
comments on the likely political and legal consequences of the recent passing
of Associate Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Margulies predicts that, due
to the ongoing presidential campaign, anyone President Obama nominates to fill
the vacancy might become both a partisan tool in presidential politics and also
a symbol for the future of America.
Strategic Memo to Hillary: Call For “Real Progress” [CalBuzz,
2/15/16]: Hillary Clinton is clearly the most qualified person running for
president in either party but she has a problem: She has no strategic message,
no over-arching statement that illuminates her values, purpose or
direction.
IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th,
5th, 6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit
V. 1st
Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and Assembly)
[See TOPICS 29-33 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that
are relevant to this unit:
VI. 14th
Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working, Citizenship & Immigration [See TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles
that are relevant to this unit:
Friedrichs v. CTA:
Justice Scalia’s Passing Changes Everything [Cal. PERB blog,
2/15/16]: With a likely 4-4 split now, it
is hard to envision any scenario this
term where the Supreme Court rules of favor of plaintiffs and
overturns Abood.
No comments:
Post a Comment