Posts for September 29, 2015
These are the posts that are accumulated in our
newsletter which goes out every 4-6 days during the school year. The posts are
organized by the major units in our Con Law (5th ed.) student textbook.
I.
Introduction to Law, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
II.
Defining the Political System: Federalism and Checks and Balances [See TOPICS 11-15 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law] Here are recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
The
American Presidency
[TOPIC 15]
Legal fight over Obama's immigration orders may outlast his presidency [CNN, 9/29/15]: The Sidonios and millions of other similarly situated families across the country have seen their dreams turn into a slow-moving court case that remains stalled.
III. The Political System: Voting and
Campaigns [See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
Voting in Presidential Primaries and Caucuses [Gerard Magliocca in Concurring
Opinions, 9/29/15]: A student posed the following question that I thought I’d
address: Is there a federal constitutional right to vote in the presidential
nominating contest? I think that the answer is no.
Legislation and the Legislative Process (TOPIC 20)
Leadership honeymoon
could be brief for a Speaker McCarthy [McClatchy,
9/28/15]: House Speaker-in-waiting Kevin McCarthy of California announced
Monday he’s ready to seize the summit of Capitol Hill. His next climb would be
even steeper – governing.
IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th,
5th, 6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit
Will the
Supreme Court 'peck away at' capital punishment? [ABA Journ., Oct. 2015]: Soon after their new term begins in October, the justices will again
confront the death penalty in a handful of cases that present relatively modest
questions and wouldn’t seem to be likely vehicles for continuing the larger
debate over the future of capital punishment.
How Prosecutors Get Away With
Cutting Black Jurors [Daily
Beast, 9/29/15]: This term, the Supreme Court will consider an outrageous case
of prosecutorial misconduct; But will it do anything about it?
Humane Criminal Justice Is Not
Hopeless [Slate,
9/28/15]: The Supreme Court is beginning to take cruel and unusual punishment
seriously -- just like Pope Francis is.
Georgia is About to Execute its First Woman in 70 Years [The Marshall Project, 9/28/15]: A closer look at why female executions are so
rare.
V. 1st
Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and Assembly) [See TOPICS 29-33 in the 5th
edition of Constitutional Law] Here are
some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
What Next Year's Attack on Obamacare
Will Look Like [Daily
Beast, 9/29/15]: Houses of worship don't have to offer employees contraceptive
coverage; But other religious employers do; Supreme Court, here we come.
School Speech Shorts [EdLawProfs Blog, 9/29/15]: School
District Employees Entitled to Qualified Immunity in Facebook Search Suit; Univ.
of Kansas Cannot Expel Student for Off-Campus Tweets.
Case of Student Rapper Deserves
Close Examination
[Newseum, 9/29/15]: The case of a former high school student from Mississippi
punished for a rap song he created off-campus and posted online has the
potential to be the most significant K-12 student speech case in several years.
Read
the decision in Bell v. Itawamba County
School Board at:
VI. 14th
Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working, Citizenship & Immigration [See TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law]
Here are some recent articles that are
relevant to this unit:
Peele: California's bad
public records laws can shock outsiders [CC Times, 9/26/15]: It's
around this time each year that a student from another state reacts
incredulously to something I've said about government access in California
during a lecture at the Graduate School of Journalism at Berkeley. A hand
shoots up. "What do you mean you can't get police reports?"
"What do you mean the courts charge for on-line searches?"
Hit the Gym, BorgataBabes [Justia, 9/29/15]: Professor
Grossman discusses a recent decision by a New Jersey appellate court that she
argues illustrates a pattern of courts erroneously failing to see the illegal
and harmful stereotyping embodied in sex-specific dress codes.
No comments:
Post a Comment