Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Posts for July 1,, 2015
These are the posts that are accumulated in our newsletter which goes out every 4-6 days during the school year. The posts are organized by the major units in our Con Law (5th ed.) student textbook.

I. Introduction to Law, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

End of an Era at the Supreme Court [Bloomberg View, 6/30/15]: The end of this term at the U.S. Supreme Court felt like the culmination of an era -- or rather of two eras. Periods in the history of the court tend to form in relation to the great, defining political issues of the day, which eventually make their way to the court in legal guise.

A court of one: Anthony Kennedy [LA Times / SF Chron, 6/30/15]: Forget the debate over whether the Supreme Court has taken a liberal turn. It is not a liberal court or a conservative court. It's a Kennedy court. On major constitutional and statutory questions, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s views matter more than anything else.

How Liberals Pitched A Near-Perfect Game This Supreme Court Term [ThinkProgress, 6/30/15]: The Supreme Court’s more liberal members did not have an absolutely perfect run in the Supreme Court term that concluded on Monday. Indeed, the term closed with losses for the Environmental Protection Agency and opponents of the death penalty, both of which were decided in a partisan 5-4 vote. But, let’s face it, this was the term where the Court’s conservatives appeared to lose their mojo. 

Has the Court Turned Left? [David Cole in the NY Rev. of Books, 6/29/15]: An excellent summary of the past term. He concludes: “We cannot know whether the Court’s liberal turn this term is an anomaly or an unconscious attempt to mirror more closely the nation’s deepest commitments, rather than the justices’ own conservative instincts. But two things are certain. The term’s two most high-profile decisions would have been far more radical had they come out the other way. And what will truly determine whether we get a conservative or liberal Court in the future is who wins the next presidential election and fills the Court’s next vacancies. Now more than ever, everything hangs in that balance.

A Fractious Majority [Slate, 6/30/15]: The Supreme Court's conservatives increasingly disagree with one another.

Is the Supreme Court More Liberal Than Obama? [Slate, 6/30/15]: One of the administration's closest allies was Clarence Thomas.

II. Defining the Political System: Federalism and Checks and Balances [See TOPICS 11-15 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

III. The Political System: Voting and Campaigns [See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

Political Fate of California Teachers Association Now Rests With High Court [KQED, 6/30/15]: For a union that has defeated almost every challenger on the playing field of state politics for more than two decades, the California Teachers Association’s most powerful opponent may turn out to be what Justice Antonin Scalia recently described as “a committee of nine unelected lawyers.”

Legislation and the Legislative Process (TOPIC 20)


Jerry Brown signs California vaccine bill [SF Chron, 6/30/15]:  Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday signed one of the strictest schoolchild vaccination laws in the country, eliminating personal and religious belief exemptions for vaccines.

Resisting Vaccination Has Long History [KQED, 6/30/15]:  She says that the modern-day resistance movement shares its roots and rhetoric with the social movements of the 1960s and ’70s, including feminism, environmentalism and consumer rights. “They encouraged people to question sources of authority, including doctors,” she says. 

IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit

 

V. 1st Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and Assembly) [See TOPICS 29-33 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

What the Supreme Court Should Have Said in the Confederate Flag Texas License Plate Case [Justia, 7/1/15]: Professor Amar discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., in which the Court held that Texas could, consistent with the First Amendment, reject a specialty license plate design application due to its prominent use of the Confederate battle flag. Amar argues that the Court’s reasoning might lead to problems in future disputes and offers a different rationale for reaching the same result that would have avoided such problems


VI. 14th Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working, Citizenship & Immigration [See TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:

Easy AA [Slate / NY Times, 6/29/15], The Supreme Court might destroy affirmative action because this white woman's grades weren't good enough.

Rhetoric and Reason in Obergefell [Prwfs Blawg, 6/28/15]: It’s not the most important thing about Obergefell--or even the second most important—but it’s noteworthy that rhetoric played a remarkably overt role in the Court’s opinions, particularly in the sharp criticisms leveled by the dissenting justices. 

A few words on Obergefell and the countermajoritarian tendency [Volokh Conspiracy, 6/29/15]: “There’s a lot of pretty complex constitutional law in play, and many prisms through which to view the case. But perhaps because I’ve been re-rereading my Federalist Papers of late, in connection with some Internet governance work I’m doing, it does seem to me that celebrations are most definitely not called for, and that, like a lot of bad constitutional law, this one will come back to bite us.”

Origin Story [Slate, 6/29/15]: How the 1942 case of a one-footed chicken thief laid the foundation for marriage equality.


No comments:

Post a Comment