Posts for June 5, 2015
These are the posts that are accumulated in our
newsletter which goes out every 4-6 days during the school year. The posts are
organized by the major units in our Con Law (5th ed.) student textbook.
I. Introduction to Law, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
II. Defining the Political System: Federalism and Checks and
Balances [See
TOPICS 11-15 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law]
Here are recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
III. The Political
System: Voting and Campaigns [See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
Political Power Tomorrow,
Today: California Politics Podcast [KQED,
6/5/15]: Political power is an interesting thing, in that it’s usually most
valuable for its perception — especially among those who fear being on the
losing side.
IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th,
5th, 6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit
Guilty Until Proven Innocent [Slate, 6/4/15]:The Supreme Court let a
vicious Arizona law die, and conservative justices are furious. The case sprang
out of an Arizona state constitutional amendment called Proposition
100. Passed by nearly 80 percent of voters in 2006, Proposition
100 barred Arizona state courts from setting bail for undocumented immigrants
accused of a broad array of crimes—not just serious offenses, but also lesser
ones such as illegally copying a sound recording.
V. 1st Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and
Assembly) [See TOPICS
29-33 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
VI. 14th Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working,
Citizenship & Immigration [See
TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
Abercrombie ruling underscores rejection of one-size-fits-all work
policies [Reuters, 6/4/15]: The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on Monday that a Muslim woman can pursue
discrimination claims against Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc after she was
denied a job for wearing a religious headscarf underscores a shift toward
employers being required under federal law to make more individualized
assessments of job applicants, lawyers for employers and employees said.
No comments:
Post a Comment