Posts for April 6, 2015
These are the posts that are accumulated in our
newsletter which goes out every 4-6 days. The posts are organized by the major
units in our Con Law (5th ed.) textbook
Law Day
2015 Resources: Magna Carta: Icon
of Liberty [ABA, 4/5/15]:
Putting the Pieces Together: Integrating Civics and
Economics with History, Geography and the Common Core [ABA, 4/5/15]: A two-day workshop in New Jersey in
July.
Spanish Language Legal Resource Website [ABA, 4/5/15]:
I. Introduction to Law, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court [See TOPICS 1-10 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
II. Defining the Political System: Federalism and Checks and
Balances [See
TOPICS 11-15 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law]
Here are recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
III. The Political
System: Voting and Campaigns [See TOPICS 16-20 in the 5th edition of Constitutional
Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to this unit:
Transparency for Initiative
Sponsors [Trial Insider,
4/6/15]: Ballot initiative proponents
must be registered California voters and must put their names on circulation
petitions to be valid in the state, an 11-judge federal appeals court has said.
Conservative lawmakers weigh bid to call
for constitutional convention [Wash Post, 4/5/15]: Conservative
state legislators frustrated with the gridlock in Washington are increasingly
turning to a plan to call a convention to consider a new amendment to the U.S.
Constitution — an event that would be unprecedented in American history and one
that could, some opponents predict, lead to complete political chaos.
Political
speech or corruption? [Wash Post Editorial, 4/6/15]: In the Supreme Court's
landmark 2010 case Citizens
United v. Federal Election Commission, the court declared that
corporate independent political expenditures are protected free speech under
the First Amendment and cannot be constrained.
Gary Hart: Billion-dollar Clinton campaign should 'frighten'
Americans [Politico, 4/6/15]: The prospect of a billion-dollar Clinton
campaign “ought to frighten every American,” he said in an interview with
POLITICO, and Democrats would be better served by a competitive primary that
forced her to speak in more depth about the issues.
IV. Criminal Law and Procedure (4th,
5th, 6th, and 8th amendments) [See TOPICS 21-28 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent
articles that are relevant to this unit:
Can Rap Lyrics Send You to Jail? If You're
a Young Black Male, Yes [The Daily Beast, 4/6/15]: Prosecutors are using defendants' use and
posting of rap lyrics against them in cases where other evidence is lacking; An
upcoming Supreme Court decision is crucial.
Shhh! It’s Time for Criminal Justice Reform. Keep
Race out of It [Justia, 3/6/15]: Professor Margulies discusses the
widespread phenomenon of conversations about criminal justice reform that
notably exclude any mention of race
What to Read on the Boston Bombing Trial [The Marshall Project, 4/6/15]:
In
time for closing arguments, ten pieces to catch you up.
V. 1st Amendment (Speech, Religion, Press and
Assembly) [See TOPICS
29-33 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
VI. 14th Amendment, Discrimination, Privacy, Working,
Citizenship & Immigration [See
TOPICS 34-41 in the 5th edition of Constitutional Law] Here are some recent articles that are relevant to
this unit:
Supreme Court Asked to Look Abroad for
Guidance on Same-Sex Marriage [Sidebar in the NY Times, 4/6/15]: The
world will be watching when the Supreme
Court hears arguments this month about same-sex
marriage. But will the court be watching the world? Two impressive
friend-of-the-court briefs have urged the justices to look abroad before
deciding whether there is a nationwide right to same-sex marriage. The briefs
agree that there is something to be learned from the experiences of the rest of
the world. But they differ about what the lesson is.
Limited Privacy Rights for Public
Employees [CNS, 4/6/15]:
A divided Washington
Supreme Court ruled Friday that public employees have no right to privacy when
they are being investigated.
No comments:
Post a Comment