There Is Nothing that Interpretation Just Is [Cass Sunstein at SSRN, 8/29/14]: “Some people believe that the very idea of interpretation requires judges to adopt a particular method for interpreting the Constitution.”

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2489088

Voting rights cases may be headed back to Supreme Court [USA Today, 9/11/14]: The Supreme Court's decision last year eliminating a barrier against voting procedure changes in mostly Southern states came with a caveat: Chief Justice John Roberts warned that the Voting Rights Act still included a "permanent, nationwide ban on racial discrimination in voting." Now federal courts from Texas to Wisconsin are on the verge of deciding whether Roberts was right — or if what remains of the 1965 law after the Supreme Court's 2013 ruling is less able to stop states from making it harder to vote.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/11/voting-rights-states-courts-wisconsin-texas-north-carolina-ohio/15279621/